GLP-1 receptor agonists (drug class)
A group of diabetes medicines called GLP-1 receptor agonists. Some are given as a weekly injection. Large trials in people with type 2 diabetes asked whether they lower the chance of heart attack, stroke and heart-related death, and one trial asked the same question in people who had heart disease and obesity but no diabetes.
Also called GLP-1 receptor agonists · GLP-1 RAs · Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
- Drug
- In this atlas
Overview
Technical summary
Class record joining the cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists. A 2018 meta-analysis of ELIXA, LEADER, SUSTAIN 6 and EXSCEL found a 10 percent lower risk of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99). Semaglutide and tirzepatide are members by the FDA established pharmacologic class listed in RxClass. SELECT tested semaglutide in people without diabetes; SURPASS-CVOT compared tirzepatide with dulaglutide.
About this drug
- Level
- Class
- Mechanism
- Not reported
Claims and evidence
Context Adults with type 2 diabetes in four GLP-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials (ELIXA, LEADER, SUSTAIN 6, EXSCEL)
- Recipient
- Adult
- Population
- Adults aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes, in randomized trials that compared a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo and had a primary outcome that included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke.
- Care setting
- Not stated in the abstract
- Geography
- Not stated in the abstract
- Life stage
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Follow-up
- Not stated for the pooled analysis. The literature search ran up to 18 September 2017.
Eligibility: 3 inclusion criteria; exclusion criteria not stated
- Included
- Adult patients (18 years or older) with type 2 diabetes
- Randomized comparison of a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo
- Primary outcome including, but not limited to, cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke
- Excluded
- None stated
A 2018 meta-analysis pooled four cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with type 2 diabetes: ELIXA (lixisenatide), LEADER (liraglutide), SUSTAIN 6 (semaglutide) and EXSCEL (extended-release exenatide). Compared with placebo, the drugs lowered the risk of the three-point major adverse cardiovascular event outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack or nonfatal stroke) by 10 percent (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; p=0.033). Cardiovascular death was 13 percent lower (0.87, 0.79 to 0.96) and death from any cause 12 percent lower (0.88, 0.81 to 0.95). The authors found no significant effect on fatal and non-fatal heart attack, fatal and non-fatal stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina, or hospital admission for heart failure. They also found no significant differences in severe hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer or medullary thyroid cancer.
Applies to Adult- Adults aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes, in randomized trials that compared a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo and had a primary outcome that included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke.
- Not stated in the abstract
- Not stated in the abstract
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Certainty method
- Not assessed
- Limitations
- A pooled analysis of published trials of four different drugs, not of one drug. The abstract says the benefit varied to varying degrees between individual drugs and that between-trial heterogeneity was low to moderate. The search ran only up to 18 September 2017, so later trials, such as SELECT and SURPASS-CVOT in this atlas, are not in it. The abstract names the funding as Amylin Pharmaceuticals (AstraZeneca). The abstract does not grade certainty. Only the PubMed abstract was read.
- Last checked
- 2026-10-14
- Next evidence check due
- Not scheduled
Sources and citations (7)
-
- Locator
- Abstract, FINDINGS, sentence 1
- How it applies
- The four trials the meta-analysis found.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
-
- Locator
- Abstract, FINDINGS, sentence 2
- How it applies
- Pooled hazard ratios for the three-point MACE outcome, cardiovascular death and all-cause death.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
-
- Locator
- Abstract, FINDINGS, sentence 3
- How it applies
- Outcomes with no significant effect.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
-
- Locator
- Abstract, FINDINGS, sentence 4
- How it applies
- Safety outcomes with no significant difference.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
-
- Locator
- Abstract, INTERPRETATION, sentence 1; Abstract, INTERPRETATION, sentence 2
- How it applies
- The authors interpretation, including variation between individual drugs.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
-
- Locator
- Abstract, METHODS, sentence 1; Abstract, METHODS, sentence 2; Abstract, METHODS, sentence 3
- How it applies
- Eligible trials and the search date.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
-
- Locator
- Abstract, FUNDING, sentence 1
- How it applies
- Funding line in the abstract.
- Retrieved
- Source effective date
- Not reported
- Source state
- Current
- Snapshot hash
dcf556409b960c64a25ada11dce3bb914295a33577ab5cd400516c6b2657fc85- Reuse basis
- PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
Clinical links
Each link reports what one cited claim says about one population. "Evaluated for" means studied, not shown to work. These links do not show that anything is effective or right for you.
-
Claim, not a settled fact A pooled analysis of four outcome trials looked at major cardiovascular events: Type 2 diabetes
Applies to Adult- Adults aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes, in randomized trials that compared a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo and had a primary outcome that included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke.
- Not stated in the abstract
- Not stated in the abstract
- Adults aged 18 years or older
A 2018 meta-analysis pooled four cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with type 2 diabetes: ELIXA (lixisenatide), LEADER (liraglutide), SUSTAIN 6 (semaglutide) and EXSCEL (extended-release exenatide). Compared with placebo, the drugs lowered the risk of the three-point major adverse cardiovascular event outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack or nonfatal stroke) by 10 percent (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; p=0.033). Cardiovascular death was 13 percent lower (0.87, 0.79 to 0.96) and death from any cause 12 percent lower (0.88, 0.81 to 0.95). The authors found no significant effect on fatal and non-fatal heart attack, fatal and non-fatal stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina, or hospital admission for heart failure. They also found no significant differences in severe hypoglycaemia, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer or medullary thyroid cancer.Limitations. A pooled analysis of published trials of four different drugs, not of one drug. The abstract says the benefit varied to varying degrees between individual drugs and that between-trial heterogeneity was low to moderate. The search ran only up to 18 September 2017, so later trials, such as SELECT and SURPASS-CVOT in this atlas, are not in it. The abstract names the funding as Amylin Pharmaceuticals (AstraZeneca). The abstract does not grade certainty. Only the PubMed abstract was read.
Record details
- Record id
cardio:glp1-receptor-agonists- Content hash
8f9687af6357b0d55d8e49e44dfc128ef699de180e570dcc8dfa01ccc5a04a82